Loading...
Title : Avenatti
link : Avenatti
Avenatti
When I first read about the Avenatti arrest for domestic violence, my first reaction was "Good." While I initially approved of the guy's punchy style, his proposed presidential bid lost me. Many other Dems felt just as annoyed. In 2015, many Republicans were similarly annoyed by Donald Trump's presidential campaign announcement, and that precedent is haunting. We don't need any more hyper-macho blowhards who lack political experience.Even Democrats who admire Avenatti's style do not want him to mount a serious presidential campaign. Antipathy is justifiable -- yet this antipathy may blind liberals to the strong indicators of political skullduggery.
As the domestic violence story progressed, the smell of fish began to pervade the air. The story broke on TMZ, a very Trumpy gossip site -- a National Enquirer for the under-60 set. The original story said that Avenatti had hit and bruised his estranged wife. She denied the claim and said that Avenatti had never hit a woman in his life (to her knowledge). His first wife also came to his defense.
So who is the alleged victim? At this writing, no-one knows. We were promised photographic evidence, but so far, it is not online. Nor are we told the nature of the injury.
Avenatti was arrested in suspicion but not charged -- a fact which hints that the accusation is iffy. He has denied striking anyone. Say what you will about the guy: He's not stupid. He knows he can't get away with denying an act that provably happened.
Recent Avenatti tweets:
First Mueller and now me. When we are fully exonerated I am coming for you Jacob Wohl aka Surefire.
There is a lot of inaccurate reporting out there. For example, (1) I have NOT been charged with anything, let alone a felony; (2) Lisa wasn't even with me Tues; etc. Numerous other "facts" being reported are completely bogus. Why is TMZ's news "standard" the new standard?Is this whole thing an op? The fact that this controversy erupted so rapidly after the abortive Mueller "hit" is more than a little suspicious. Also suspicious: The right went into immediate combat mode -- trolls, bots, cartoons, memes, the works. When a genuine surprise hits, the siege machine usually needs a day or so to wheel into place.
Fact: There are women in this country -- and puh-lease do not insult my intelligence by pretending otherwise -- who will happily sport a shiner for a cool million. Maybe $100k. Maybe less than that. (It's like that old joke sometimes ascribed to Bernard Shaw: "We've already established what kind of woman you are, madam. Now we are discussing price.") We know from the Mueller "hit" that the smear merchants thought that $20k should suffice. That particular op went south only because the dirty tricksters went too cheap.
We don't know how convincing the photo evidence truly is. Remember when Roger Stone claimed to be a victim of "polonium poisoning"? He also showed photos. Do not underestimate the shamelessness of this crowd.
I have seen no evidence, yet, that Wohl has any connection to the Avenatti imbroglio. However, this background briefing on Wohl will prove very enlightening.
Let's leave the Avenatti case to one side, for the moment. Speaking generally, it is clear that right-wing activists love the idea of weaponizing feminist neo-puritanism against Democrats. It's like shooting tin cans on a fence: Plink plink plink, down they go, one by one. Gales of laughter with every plink. The first plink hits a genuine bad guy (Weinstein). That plink is used to justify the rest: Garrison Keillor, Al Franken, Robert DeNiro, Keith Ellison, Eric Schneiderman, etc.
Whenever one points out the problems besetting any of these claims, some idiot will inevitably say: "What about Weinstein?" A similar problem occurs whenever one tries to discuss Bill Clinton. How many times have you run into people who tell you that that Juanita Broaddrick must be telling the truth, because Monica Lewinski. And never mind the fact that Broaddrick's story was so full of holes that neither Ken Starr nor the National Enquirer would touch it. (Broaddrick supported Brett Kavanaugh. Apparently, only Democrats rape. Such was the impression I got from her Twitter feed.)
Weaponized feminism will continue to destroy male Democrats until liberals wake up and realize that not all women are truth-tellers and not all men are evil Penismonsters. Most guys are, in fact, pretty decent. So are most women -- but not all. Corruption comes in all colors and genders. So does rationalization.
If you still think that females never lie, consider: James O'Keefe would not have brought down ACORN without the aide of an actress pretending to be a whore. Then again, was it really a pretense?
("Cannon, are you ever going to get over the Franken thing?" No. I'll never forgive what happened to Hillary in 2008 and 2016, and I will never forgive the smearing of Al Franken.)
Mueller. Trump claims that he knows everything going on the Mueller investigation. We know that the Trumpers have spent much of the previous years searching for inside information.
My personal belief is that Mueller has less on Trump than we would like. The cronies have only pretended to cooperate; Trump will pardon his way out of his troubles.
Thus Article Avenatti
That's an article Avenatti This time, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.
You are now reading the article Avenatti with the link address https://wordcomes.blogspot.com/2018/11/avenatti.html
0 Response to "Avenatti"
Post a Comment