Loading...
Title : Catching up
link : Catching up
Catching up
I let my William Barr post stay up for a while because I hoped that the news would spread. Alas, most still don't understand that Barr is a CIA man through-and-through, and that he has, in past times, been incredibly effective in covering up covert misdeeds. The fact that Barr has allied himself with Trump tells us much about the intelligence community's relationship with the far right.(As some of you know, it all started with Gehlen. It didn't end there.)
Trump has chosen Barr because Barr has promised to take the fight to Trump's foes -- Hillary and Comey. As Digby said:
They really, really, really want to lock her up. I've never seen anything like this. It's just sick.This tactic works because the Clintons rarely defend themselves, and because so many on the left see it as a point of honor to be every bit as psychotically anti-Clinton as the rightwingers are.
(Example: Not too long ago, Virginia Heffernan told her listeners not to buy Bill Clinton's latest book because he's such a notorious abuser of women. Bullshit. He never abused anyone. Does Heffernan actually believe the nonsense spewed by Juanita Brodderick? The woman whose story was so full of holes that even the National Enquirer wouldn't touch it? The woman who later supported Brett freakin' Kavanaugh?)
As a result of this left/right "Open season on the Clintons" attitude, Hillary's approval ratings are actually worse than Trump's. It makes sense for Trump to continue to go after her. Where's the downside?
For years, right-wing propagandists have accused Hillary of being the real-life equivalent of a James Bond supervillain, yet the incessant, interminable Republican-led investigations of her have never led to any charges. Trump has been in charge for two years, during which time the GOP has controlled all three branches of government. Still no charges.
If Trump doesn't gin up some kind of a trial, the rubes will figure out that that they've been fed a lot of BS over the past quarter century. Sure, many Trumpers are trying to convince themselves that Jeff Sessions was a secret agent for Evil Soros all along. But that excuse will go only so far.
Mark Meadows may become the new Chief of Staff, according to Axios.
Trump has asked confidants what they think about the idea of installing Rep. Mark Meadows, the chairman of the ultra-conservative House Freedom Caucus, as John Kelly's permanent replacement, according to these three sources. Trump has also mentioned three other candidates besides Meadows, according to a source with direct knowledge. I don't yet have their names.Meadows is bad news. A key opponent of John Boehner from the right, Meadows is a Tea Partier who voted against Hurricane Sandy relief. He did more than others to deep-six Obamacare, and he has been utterly reckless in his advocacy of government shutdowns. There was also a strange business involving mysterious payments to a former staffer accused of sexual misconduct.
(Maybe Heffernan should look into that.)
Hilariously, Meadows favors a balanced budget amendment. This, despite the fact that Trump is the deficit-spender par excellence.
Rumor holds that one of the other candidates for the position is -- get this -- Matt Whitaker. If he gets the gig, I will be speechless. The dude's a crook. Even by Trump-era standards, his venality is outrageous. Unfortunately, the Chief of Staff does not require Senate confirmation.
Comey. Trump's tweets are madder than ever. Worse, many people have bought into the biggest of his many big lies: They really do believe that Comey was on Hillary's side during the 2016 election.
To counter this absurdity, sane people must incessantly repeat these three words: Comey helped Trump. Comey helped Trump. Comey helped Trump. Whether he did so intentionally or otherwise is immaterial. Comey insured Trump's election by talking in public about the Weiner laptop debacle while keeping secret the all-important fact that Trump was under an FBI investigation.
We recently learned that Peter Strzok also knew about the Trump investigation. (This fact came out during Comey's testimony.) If Strzok truly was the deep-dish Hillary agent that the right imagines him to be, why didn't he leak the truth about Trump to the media?
Let's take it further. If Strzok was as partisan as the right imagines him to be, he would have issued a statement at the beginning of November, 2016: "I can keep silent no longer: The public should know that the FBI is investigating Trump's ties to Russia." Signed: Peter Strzok. Sure, he would have been fired. But if Evil Soros is truly as evil as the right-wing conspiratards believe, then Strzok would surely have received a "thank you" check large enough to justify the inconvenience. Right?
Many on the right believe that the FBI's investigation of Trump was nothing more than a dirty trick played by the so-called "Deep State." Then why didn't we hear about it before the election? Secrecy made the "trick" ineffective and pointless.
In his latest tirades, Trump accused Comey of lying. Evidence? Donald J. Trump don't need no stinkin' evidence.
Although most on the left think that Trump is simply raging incoherently, I suspect that he is acting according to a plan. (A plan perhaps concocted with Barr's aid? Perhaps.) Step 1 of this plan is to get Comey on the record. Step 2 is to find some reasonably plausible way to challenge one of his statements. Step 3, of course, would be a trial of Jim Comey -- the kind of trial that Uncle Joe Stalin would have loved.
More madness. Trump also tweeted a tirade directed against Richard Blumenthal. Shade your eyeballs, because a gale-force blast of chutzpah is a-headin' for your retinas:
Watched Da Nang Dick Blumenthal on television spewing facts almost as accurate as his bravery in Vietnam (which he never saw). As the bullets whizzed by Da Nang Dicks head, as he was saving soldiers....
....left and right, he then woke up from his dream screaming that HE LIED. Next time I go to Vietnam I will ask “the Dick” to travel with me!Trump's syntax is so garbled that one hardly knows what to make of this statement. But one thing is clear: The guy who dodged Vietnam by pretending to have bone spurs (which never kept him away from golf) has no right to complain about anyone else's service.
I've never encountered another public figure so lacking in self-awareness, humility, or decency. Even Hitler had better public manners.
Michael Cohen. I'm a little sorry that the prosecutors in New York have threatened him with the proverbial tossed book. Unlike all of the other "flipped" Trump aides, Cohen seems sincere in his new loyalties. I am convinced that he now hates his former boss.
A long-ish sentence may encourage him to keep helping Robert Mueller. Good deeds = less time.
Yes, Cohen did wrong. Yes, his crimes were serious. But if Michael Cohen brings down Donald Trump, I would support letting him walk. More than that: I would favor changing the name of the Washington Mall to the Michael D. Cohen National Concourse and Softball Fields.
A final note. I began this post with the intent of writing at length about the Yellow Jacket movement in Paris, which has disturbing parallels to the Occupy movement in this country. Funny, innit? These uprisings happen only when a Democrat -- or, in Macron's case, a small-d democrat -- holds power. Note that the NY Post and Trump himself seem to favor the Yellow Jackets.
But that's a very large subject, and thus must wait for another time.
Thus Article Catching up
That's an article Catching up This time, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.
You are now reading the article Catching up with the link address https://wordcomes.blogspot.com/2018/12/catching-up.html
0 Response to "Catching up"
Post a Comment