Loading...
Title : PROOF that Barr is lying
link : PROOF that Barr is lying
PROOF that Barr is lying
When Barr's dubious letter was first published, I immediately noted his refusal to quote from Mueller's summary. Reports of this sort always have a summary.Marcy Wheeler (a thousand blessings upon her eagle eyes!) has focused on this key concept: Summary.
But I want to look at the actual news detail in the story: that Mueller’s team wrote multiple summaries. The article uses the word four times (plus a caption) including these three references:Leopold will surely get the door slammed in his face, so I doubt that he'll be able to save the day. Maybe someone else will. Maybe someone in Congress.
Mr. Barr has said he will move quickly to release the nearly 400-page report but needs time to scrub out confidential information. The special counsel’s investigators had already written multiple summaries of the report, and some team members believe that Mr. Barr should have included more of their material in the four-page letter he wrote on March 24 laying out their main conclusions, according to government officials familiar with the investigation. Mr. Barr only briefly cited the special counsel’s work in his letter.The detail is useful because it tells Jerry Nadler and FOIA terrorist Jason Leopold precisely what they’re looking for: Mueller’s own summaries of their findings (which in fact may be parallel summaries, addressing multiple questions).
However, the special counsel’s office never asked Mr. Barr to release the summaries soon after he received the report, a person familiar with the investigation said. And the Justice Department quickly determined that the summaries contain sensitive information, like classified material, secret grand-jury testimony and information related to current federal investigations that must remain confidential, according to two government officials.
Let's put the key words in boldface:
And the Justice Department quickly determined that the summaries contain sensitive information, like classified material...Oh really? Izzat so? The WP tells a rather different tale (boldface added by me)...
Summaries were prepared for different sections of the report, with a view that they could made public, the official said.To recap:
The report was prepared “so that the front matter from each section could have been released immediately — or very quickly,” the official said. “It was done in a way that minimum redactions, if any, would have been necessary, and the work would have spoken for itself.”
Mueller’s team assumed the information was going to be made available to the public, the official said, “and so they prepared their summaries to be shared in their own words — and not in the attorney general’s summary of their work, as turned out to be the case.”
1. Summaries were prepared with public release in mind.
2. Barr refused to publish or quote from these summaries.
3. When asked to release the summaries, Barr's Justice Department pretended that they contain classified material. They do not. In accordance with all precedence (not to mention common sense), those summaries were written to be read by "poor on'ry people like you and like I."
Conclusion: Barr is lying. Simple as that.
Further conclusion: He would not have told this lie if the actual Mueller report were helpful to Trump. Simple as that.
Do not underestimate the importance of this. I've been demoralized for months, but now I'm starting to grin again. Reports leak; they always do. The brown-n-smelly is hurtling toward the sharp-n-whirly -- and when it hits, a huge stink will engulf both Trump and Barr.
Thus Article PROOF that Barr is lying
That's an article PROOF that Barr is lying This time, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.
You are now reading the article PROOF that Barr is lying with the link address https://wordcomes.blogspot.com/2019/04/proof-that-barr-is-lying.html
0 Response to "PROOF that Barr is lying"
Post a Comment